Total views : 268

Beyond the Shareholder - Stakeholder Tug-of-War: Introducing Emergent Action

Affiliations

  • Strathclyde Business School, University of Strathclyde, United Arab Emirates

Abstract


No Abstract.

Full Text:

 |  (PDF views: 126)

References


  • Aguilera, R. V., & Cuervo-Cazurra, A. (2004). Codes of Good Governance Worldwide: What is the Trigger? Organization Studies, 25 (3), 415-443.
  • Ansari, S. M., Fiss, P. C., & Zajac, E. J. (2010). Made to Fit: How Practices Vary as They Diffuse. Academy of Management Review, 35 (1), 67-92.
  • Arrow, K. J. (1964). The Role of Securities in the Optimal Allocation of Risk Bearing. Review of Economic Studies, 31(2), 91-96. Bateson, G. (1979). Mind and Nature: A Necessary Unity. Toranto, Canada: Bantam Books.
  • Bebchuk, L. A. (2002). Asymmetric Information and the Choice of Corporate Governance Arrangements. The Harvard John M. Olin Discussion Paper Series, Discussion Paper No. 398. Boston, MA, USA: Harvard Law School. Retrieved from http:// www.law.harvard.edu/programs/olin_center/
  • Bohm, D. (1980). Wholesomeness and the Implicite Order. London, UK: Routledge.
  • Byrne, D. S. (1998). Complexity Theory and the Social Sciences: An Introduction. London: Routledge.
  • Crane, A., Matten, D., & Moon, J. (2004). Stakeholders as Citizens? Rethinking Rights, Participation, and Democracy. Journal of Business Ethics, 53 (1), 107-122.
  • Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1990). Flow: The Psychology of Optimal Experience. New York, NY: HarperCollins.
  • Damasio, A. (1994). Descartes' Error: Emotion, Reason, and the Human Brain. New York, USA: Harper Perennial.
  • Davis, G. F., & Thompson, T. A. (1994). A Social Movement Perspective on Corporate Control. Administrative Science Quarterly, 39 (1), 141-173.
  • Dignam, A., &Galanis, M. (2009). The Globalization of Corporate Governance. Farnham, Surrey, UK: Ashgate Publishing Limited.
  • Evan, W. M., & Freeman, R. E. (1988). "A Stakeholder Theory of the Modern Corporation: Kantian Capitalism. In T. L. Beauchamp & N. Bowie (Eds.), Ethical Theory and Business (3rd ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ, USA: Prentice Hall.
  • Fama, E. F., & Jensen, M. C. (1983). Separation of Ownership and Control . Journal of Law & Economics, 26(2), 301-325.
  • Ford, J. D., & Ford, L. W. (1994). Logics of Identity, Contradiction, and Attraction in Change. The Academy of Management Reveiw, 19(4), 756-785.
  • Freeman, R. E. (2010). Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  • Freeman, R. E., Harrison, J. S., & Wicks, A. C. (2007). Managing for Stakeholders: Survival, Reputation and Success. New Haven, USA: Yale University Press.
  • Friedman, M. (1970). The Social Responsibility of Business is to Increase its Profits. The New York Times Magazine.
  • Fris, J., &Lazaridou, A. (2006). An Additional Way of Thinking About Organizational Life and Leadership: The Quantum Perspective. Canadian Journal of Educational Administration and Policy, 48, online.
  • Ghemawat, P. (1991). Commitment: The Dynamic of Strategy. New York, USA: Free Press.
  • Hanson, D., & Klimo, J. (1998). Toward a Phenomenology of Synchronicity. In R. S. Valle (Ed.), Phenomenological Inquiry in Psychology: Existential and Transpersonal Dimensions (pp. 281- 307). New York, USA: Plenum Press.
  • Horn, R. E. (1983a). Horn, R. E. Traps of Traditional Logic and Dialectics: What They Are and How to Avoid Them, Lexington Institute. Retrieved May 22, 2012, a from http://www.stanford.edu/ ∼rhorn/a/topic/phil/artclTrapsTraditnlLogic.pdf
  • Horn, R. E. (1983b). An Overview of Trialectics within Applications to Psychology and Public Policy. In R. Horn (Ed.), Trialectics: Toward a practical logic of unity (pp. 1-39). Lexington, MA: Information Resources.
  • Ichazo, O. (1976). The Human Process for Enlightenment and Freedom. New York: Arica Institute Press.
  • Iwu-Egwuonwu, R. C. (2010). Some empirical literature evidence on the effects of independent directors on firm performance. Journal of Economics and International Finance, 2(9), 190-198.
  • Jensen, M. (2002). Value Maximization, Stakeholder Theory, and the Corporate Objective Function. Business Ethics Quarterly, 12(2), 235-256.
  • Klingaman, W. K. (2002). Abraham Lincoln and the Road to Emancipation, 1861-1865. New York, USA: Penguin.
  • Langtry, B. (1994). Stakeholders and the Moral Responsibilities of Business. Business Ethics Quarterly, 4(4), 431 - 443.
  • Letza, S., & Sun, X. (2002). Corporate Governance: Paradigms, Dilemmas and Beyond. Poznan University of Economic Review, 2(1), 43-63.
  • Lipton, B. H. (2005). The Biology of Belief: Unleashing the Power of Consciousness, Matter and Miracles. Santa Rosa, CA, USA: Mountain of Love/ Elite Books.
  • McEachern, W. A. (2012). Contemporary Economics, 3rd Edition. Mason, OH, USA: South-Western Educational Publishers.
  • Mizuo, J. (1999). Business Ethics and Corporate Governance in Japanese Corporations. Business and Society Review, 102(1), 65- 79. doi:10.1111/0045-3609.00027
  • Nayak, A. C., &Sotnak, E. (1995). Kant on the Impossibility of the "Soft Sciences." Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 55(1), 133-151.
  • O'Sullivan, M. (2000). The Innovative Enterprise and Corporate Governance. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 24(4), 393-416.
  • Rawls, J. (2001). Justice as Fairness: A Restatement, 2nd Edition. (E. Kelly, Ed.). Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
  • Senge, P. (1994). The Fifth Discipline: The Art and Practice of the Learning Organisation. New York, USA: Currency Doubleday.
  • Simon, H. A. (1979). Rational Decision Making in Business Organizations. The American Economic Review, 69(4), 493-513.
  • Useem, M. (2004). Corporate Leadership in a Globalizing Equity Market. In T. Clarke (Ed.), Theories of Corporate Governance: The Philosophical foundations of corporate governance (pp. 206-222). London, UK: Routledge.
  • Waddock, S. (2003). Editorial: making corporate citizenship real. Journal of Corporate Citizenship, 9, 3-7.

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.